Deontological and Utilitarian Responses to Sacrificial Dilemmas Predict Disapproval of Sin Stocks
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract. Investors sometimes invest in the so-called “sin” stocks that cause social harm as a by-product of doing business (e.g., tobacco companies). Three studies examined whether people who reject and maximize outcomes sacrificial dilemmas approve less investing sin (but not conventional) stocks. We employed process dissociation to assess harm-rejection (deontological) outcome-maximization (utilitarian) response tendencies independently. Study 1 ( N = 337) assessed moral approval stocks: People scoring higher on either deontological or utilitarian disapproved sin, but conventional, 2 402) replicated this effect for willingness companies abandoning (vs. retaining) socially responsible policies. 3 558) confirmed earlier findings using more conservative measures. These clarify psychology morally questionable investment decisions.
منابع مشابه
The mismeasure of morals: antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas.
Researchers have recently argued that utilitarianism is the appropriate framework by which to evaluate moral judgment, and that individuals who endorse non-utilitarian solutions to moral dilemmas (involving active vs. passive harm) are committing an error. We report a study in which participants responded to a battery of personality assessments and a set of dilemmas that pit utilitarian and non...
متن کاملAre Utilitarian/Deontological Preferences Unidimensional?
Utilitarian versus deontological inclinations have been studied extensively in the field of moral psychology. However, the field has been lacking a thorough psychometric evaluation of the most commonly used measures. In this paper, we examine the factorial structure of an often used set of 12 moral dilemmas purportedly measuring utilitarian/deontological moral inclinations. We ran three differe...
متن کاملSidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment
Research into moral decision-making has been dominated by sacrificial dilemmas where, in order to save several lives, it is necessary to sacrifice the life of another person. It is widely assumed that these dilemmas draw a sharp contrast between utilitarian and deontological approaches to morality, and thereby enable us to study the psychological and neural basis of utilitarian judgment. Howeve...
متن کامل‘Utilitarian’ judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good
A growing body of research has focused on so-called 'utilitarian' judgments in moral dilemmas in which participants have to choose whether to sacrifice one person in order to save the lives of a greater number. However, the relation between such 'utilitarian' judgments and genuine utilitarian impartial concern for the greater good remains unclear. Across four studies, we investigated the relati...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Social Psychology
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1864-9335', '2151-2590']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000474